09-20-2022, 10:13 AM
Proposal: ConeChain™ with Proof-Of-Cone technology
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/xiz23n/proposal_conechain_with_proofofcone_technology/"> <img src="https://a.thumbs.redditmedia.com/YyaWjGLEAyftd7AAtDfe6e8kdVAahIOWdefC1DcE7C0.jpg" alt="Proposal: ConeChain™ with Proof-Of-Cone technology" title="Proposal: ConeChain™ with Proof-Of-Cone technology" /> </a> </td><td> <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Okay, I get it, I get it. Many blockchains have risen and fallen over time but none of them have been able to truly overcome the blockchain trilemma of decentralization, speed, and scalability. I've gone ahead and represented this trilemma in a graphic so that we can better understand the issue at hand.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/r58v9cf3vxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c5dd483a550d79c893a8b1996d31b565411dffb">https://preview.redd.it/r58v9cf3vxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c5dd483a550d79c893a8b1996d31b565411dffb</a></p> <p>Fortunately, my team and I at ConeChain™ believe that we have found a solution to the long-lived problem, solidifying the prevalence of ConeChain™ in history and assuring the success of cryptocurrency as a whole.</p> <p>The solution takes a multi-pronged approach to solving the long thought unsolvable cone juxtaposition problem, where multiple cones appear too far apart on the ConeChain™, creating a dangerous situation bound to end in disaster. This is represented below.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/xdn0se5twxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=101d6decde0964e853bbbc6e47451a6d5cd25a87">https://preview.redd.it/xdn0se5twxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=101d6decde0964e853bbbc6e47451a6d5cd25a87</a></p> <p>This can result in a dangerous, but avoidable result for the ConeChain.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/q4rlykcywxo91.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=4c3512c0e83b88182be69c7ca6c7c8b096cc0596">The results of a coneless proof-of-cone-cone chain</a></p> <p>This situation can be resolved in two ways. We have discovered that it is possible to use Cone Breadth Telemetry (<strong>CBT</strong>) to analyze the distance between cones, but we have opted to use proof of cone instead. The concept is quite simple-- any cone that is a cone is a cone and any cone that is not a cone is not a cone, easily reducing the distance between cones and resolving the conechain trilemma once and for all. This is represented below.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/hney8mrwyxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=67a8066ce6261425aaaa3ed3670b28e05cec15ef">Identifications of True and False cones</a></p> <p>As such, it can be argued that finding correct cones is a viable method of proving work in a blockchain system, reinforcing the fact that ConeChain™ is superior.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/DudePotato3"> /u/DudePotato3 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/xiz23n/proposal_conechain_with_proofofcone_technology/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/xiz23n/proposal_conechain_with_proofofcone_technology/">[comments]</a></span> </td></tr></table>
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/xiz23n/proposal_conechain_with_proofofcone_technology/"> <img src="https://a.thumbs.redditmedia.com/YyaWjGLEAyftd7AAtDfe6e8kdVAahIOWdefC1DcE7C0.jpg" alt="Proposal: ConeChain™ with Proof-Of-Cone technology" title="Proposal: ConeChain™ with Proof-Of-Cone technology" /> </a> </td><td> <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Okay, I get it, I get it. Many blockchains have risen and fallen over time but none of them have been able to truly overcome the blockchain trilemma of decentralization, speed, and scalability. I've gone ahead and represented this trilemma in a graphic so that we can better understand the issue at hand.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/r58v9cf3vxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c5dd483a550d79c893a8b1996d31b565411dffb">https://preview.redd.it/r58v9cf3vxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=1c5dd483a550d79c893a8b1996d31b565411dffb</a></p> <p>Fortunately, my team and I at ConeChain™ believe that we have found a solution to the long-lived problem, solidifying the prevalence of ConeChain™ in history and assuring the success of cryptocurrency as a whole.</p> <p>The solution takes a multi-pronged approach to solving the long thought unsolvable cone juxtaposition problem, where multiple cones appear too far apart on the ConeChain™, creating a dangerous situation bound to end in disaster. This is represented below.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/xdn0se5twxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=101d6decde0964e853bbbc6e47451a6d5cd25a87">https://preview.redd.it/xdn0se5twxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=101d6decde0964e853bbbc6e47451a6d5cd25a87</a></p> <p>This can result in a dangerous, but avoidable result for the ConeChain.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/q4rlykcywxo91.png?width=720&format=png&auto=webp&s=4c3512c0e83b88182be69c7ca6c7c8b096cc0596">The results of a coneless proof-of-cone-cone chain</a></p> <p>This situation can be resolved in two ways. We have discovered that it is possible to use Cone Breadth Telemetry (<strong>CBT</strong>) to analyze the distance between cones, but we have opted to use proof of cone instead. The concept is quite simple-- any cone that is a cone is a cone and any cone that is not a cone is not a cone, easily reducing the distance between cones and resolving the conechain trilemma once and for all. This is represented below.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/hney8mrwyxo91.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=67a8066ce6261425aaaa3ed3670b28e05cec15ef">Identifications of True and False cones</a></p> <p>As such, it can be argued that finding correct cones is a viable method of proving work in a blockchain system, reinforcing the fact that ConeChain™ is superior.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> submitted by <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/DudePotato3"> /u/DudePotato3 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/xiz23n/proposal_conechain_with_proofofcone_technology/">[link]</a></span> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/xiz23n/proposal_conechain_with_proofofcone_technology/">[comments]</a></span> </td></tr></table>