05-19-2020, 06:13 PM
Tribalism in this space vs. use-case.
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I want to keep this as brief as possible, so here goes... </p> <p>In my sincere opinion every cryptocurrency that has some form of "functional" technology will see a use case that is successful. </p> <p>I'm no shill, but the one crypto I don't see anybody pooping on is Monero. This is largely because it has lived up to its use case as the "uncrackable" privacy coin. </p> <p>Bitcoin, as the narrative goes, is digital gold. If we see lightning going anywhere, it may very well become more than just digital gold. </p> <p>If you want something that is instant, Nano exists for that purpose. However, the important part with nano is that it is <strong>feeless.</strong> and might be more friendly towards users in developing countries. In Cambodia you can get USD from ATMs for use in every day consumption. Over there, paying 35 cents for a transaction of 10 USD is killer. </p> <p>Ethereum is useful if you want to make your own currency, if Eth 2.0 ever gets off the ground and scalability becomes real. </p> <p>If XRP ever gets over their legal hurdles in the US, then crypto-remittances might very well become a thing. </p> <p>The one thing that bothers me, however, is the tribalism in this sub. I don't believe there is "one coin to rule them all." However, I do think it is a good idea, to hold key opinion leaders and cryptocurrency creators to what they say and what they do when they make mistakes.</p> <p><strong>EDIT: to the kids calling me a Nano shill, please check my post history and tell me when the last time I posted in that sub was. Your memory might be better than mine.</strong></p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> Kind Regards R
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I want to keep this as brief as possible, so here goes... </p> <p>In my sincere opinion every cryptocurrency that has some form of "functional" technology will see a use case that is successful. </p> <p>I'm no shill, but the one crypto I don't see anybody pooping on is Monero. This is largely because it has lived up to its use case as the "uncrackable" privacy coin. </p> <p>Bitcoin, as the narrative goes, is digital gold. If we see lightning going anywhere, it may very well become more than just digital gold. </p> <p>If you want something that is instant, Nano exists for that purpose. However, the important part with nano is that it is <strong>feeless.</strong> and might be more friendly towards users in developing countries. In Cambodia you can get USD from ATMs for use in every day consumption. Over there, paying 35 cents for a transaction of 10 USD is killer. </p> <p>Ethereum is useful if you want to make your own currency, if Eth 2.0 ever gets off the ground and scalability becomes real. </p> <p>If XRP ever gets over their legal hurdles in the US, then crypto-remittances might very well become a thing. </p> <p>The one thing that bothers me, however, is the tribalism in this sub. I don't believe there is "one coin to rule them all." However, I do think it is a good idea, to hold key opinion leaders and cryptocurrency creators to what they say and what they do when they make mistakes.</p> <p><strong>EDIT: to the kids calling me a Nano shill, please check my post history and tell me when the last time I posted in that sub was. Your memory might be better than mine.</strong></p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> Kind Regards R